From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Przysiecki v. Eifert

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jun 29, 2007
Civil 07cv0039 WQH(RBB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2007)

Opinion


THE ESTATE OF KYLE PRZYSIECKI, by and through its administrators, MICHAEL PRZYSIECKI and VENUS ANGELIQUE HISAW; MICHAEL PRZYSIECKI, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. SHANNON DUANE EIFERT; COUNTY OF IMPERIAL; IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT; STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION; CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL; DOES 1-50, inclusive Defendants. Civil No. 07cv0039 WQH(RBB) United States District Court, S.D. California. June 29, 2007

          ORDER FOLLOWING EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CONFERENCE, SETTING RULE 26 COMPLIANCE AND NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

          RUBEN B. BROOKS, Magistrate Judge.

         On June 29, 2007, the Court held an early neutral evaluation conference in the above-entitled action. Settlement could not be reached in the case.

         The Court discussed compliance with rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and issues the following orders:

         No objections were presented to initial disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 26(a)(1)(A-D). The parties are ordered to proceed with the initial disclosure process. Any objections to initial disclosure will be resolved as required by rule 26.

         2. The rule 26(f) conference shall be completed on or before July 23, 2007.

         3. No discovery plan is required.

         4. The initial disclosures pursuant to rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) shall occur on or before August 17, 2007.

         5. Counsel, all parties, and any other person(s) whose authority is required to negotiate and enter into a settlement shall appear in person on October 26, 2007, at 1:30 p.m. in the chambers of United States Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks, U.S. Courts Building, 940 Front Street, Room 1185, San Diego, California, XXXXX-XXXX, for a further settlement conference.

         Plaintiff's(s') counsel shall serve a copy of this order on all parties that enter this case after the date of this order.

         Failure of any counsel or party to comply with this order may result in sanctions.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Estate of Przysiecki v. Eifert

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jun 29, 2007
Civil 07cv0039 WQH(RBB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2007)
Case details for

Estate of Przysiecki v. Eifert

Case Details

Full title:THE ESTATE OF KYLE PRZYSIECKI, by and through its administrators, MICHAEL…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Jun 29, 2007

Citations

Civil 07cv0039 WQH(RBB) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 29, 2007)