Opinion
2:12-cv-0478-LDG-PAL
01-22-2013
ESTATE OF LAUREN MASI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et la., Defendants.
On March 28, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss (#4); on April 25, 2012, defendants filed a status report indicating that plaintiffs had not timely responded to the motion to dismiss (#7); and on January 18, 2013, defendants filed a notice of non-opposition to their motion to dismiss (#8). Pursuant to LR 7-2 (d) (the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion), and based on the merit of the arguments presented in the motion to dismiss,
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that defendants' motion to dismiss (#4) is GRANTED.
_____________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge