From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Lopez v. City of Ontario

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
5:23-cv-02304-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-02304-SSS-SPx

02-20-2024

Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr., et al. v. City of Ontario, et al.


PRESENT: HONORABLE SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m).

In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff has not served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 5, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to Defendants Doe Ontario Employees; Doe San Bernardino Employees; Doe State Employees; and Does 110, who have not been served, for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged if Plaintiff files, before the deadline set forth above, a proof of service of the summons and complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Estate of Lopez v. City of Ontario

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
5:23-cv-02304-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Estate of Lopez v. City of Ontario

Case Details

Full title:Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr., et al. v. City of Ontario, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 20, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-02304-SSS-SPx (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)