From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Knapp

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jan 11, 1950
95 Cal.App.2d 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)

Opinion

Docket No. 17350.

January 11, 1950.

MOTION to augment record on appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County fixing inheritance tax. Ernest D. Wagner, Judge. Motion denied.

Heaney, Price, Postel Parma for Appellant.

James W. Hickey, Raymond G. LaNoue and Morton L. Barker for Respondent.


THE COURT.

[1] The executor of the estate of George Owen Knapp, deceased, filed objection to the report of the inheritance tax appraiser and was overruled in the trial court. From the order fixing inheritance tax, the executor appealed. Thereupon, respondent moved to augment the record on appeal by adding a copy of the will of George Owen Knapp. Appellant contends that the will was never offered to the trial court and that the matter was submitted solely upon a written stipulation of facts. The judge who tried the case states that the will was not considered in fixing the tax.

The file has been gone over, with reference to the motion to augment the record.

The stipulation is controlling:

"The following facts are stipulated to be true and proof thereof is hereby waived and the same shall constitute the entire evidence and proof for the purpose of determining the issues raised by the report of the Inheritance Tax Appraiser and the objection of said Executor thereto." (Emphasis added.)

Therefore, the motion to augment the record by bringing up the will of the decedent is denied.


Summaries of

Estate of Knapp

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One
Jan 11, 1950
95 Cal.App.2d 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)
Case details for

Estate of Knapp

Case Details

Full title:Estate of GEORGE OWEN KNAPP, Deceased. FREDERICK A. GODLEY, as Executor…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division One

Date published: Jan 11, 1950

Citations

95 Cal.App.2d 536 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)
213 P.2d 408

Citing Cases

Sutton v. Richardson

We deny the request for leave to file the Supplemental Brief (the gist of which is that appellant should be…

Garcia v. Martin

The motion is therefore denied. (Rules on Appeal, rule 12 (a); People v. Wein, 50 Cal.2d 383, 411 [ 326 P.2d…