From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Kaemper v. Smukal

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Dec 3, 1942
55 Cal.App.2d 946 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)

Opinion

Docket No. 13830.

December 3, 1942.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Jess E. Stephens, Judge. Appeal dismissed on motion.

William Ellis Lady for Appellant.

Ernest C. Griffith for Respondents.


THE COURT.

Respondents have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has failed to file her points and authorities within the time allowed by rule and an order of this court. The appellant has failed to oppose the motion.

It appears that the time allowed by rule I of the Rules for Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal for the filing of appellant's points and authorities expired on August 21, 1942, that within that period appellant obtained from this court an order extending the time for filing her opening brief to September 21, 1942, but that no brief or memorandum of points and authorities in behalf of appellant has been filed within that time or at all.

Under the circumstances appellant is deemed to have abandoned the appeal (rule V, § 3) and the same is hereby dismissed.

Schauer, P.J., Shinn, J., and Shaw, J. pro tem., concurred.


Summaries of

Estate of Kaemper v. Smukal

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three
Dec 3, 1942
55 Cal.App.2d 946 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)
Case details for

Estate of Kaemper v. Smukal

Case Details

Full title:Estate of JOSEPHINE KAEMPER, Deceased. MARY KEMPER, Appellant, v. G.H…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Three

Date published: Dec 3, 1942

Citations

55 Cal.App.2d 946 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)
131 P.2d 384

Citing Cases

Sherwood v. Cornfield

[1] Where an appellant fails to file a brief, the appellate court may treat the appeal as abandoned and an…