Opinion
Civil Action No. 4:04cv344-p-b.
July 12, 2006
ORDER OF REMAND
This matter comes before the court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [18-1]. After due consideration of the defendant's notice of removal and the plaintiff's motion to remand — no response to the motion to remand having been filed — the court finds as follows, to-wit:
Pursuant to the Fifth Circuit's decision in Gray v. Beverly Enterprises-Mississippi, Inc., 390 F.3d 400 (5th Cir. (Miss.) 2004), the motion to remand is well-taken and should be granted. Essentially, the Court in Gray held that contrary to the defendants' argument for removal in this case, "it is at least reasonable to expect that a Mississippi court might find that the allegations of the in-state defendants' malfeasance and nonfeasance are sufficient to state a claim under state law." Id. at 410. Thus, pursuant to Travis v. Irby, 326 F.3d 644, 647 (5th Cir. 2003), the plaintiff has demonstrated that there is a reasonable basis for predicting that she will recover against the Mississippi administrator-defendants in state court. Accordingly, the defendants cannot meet their burden in proving improper joinder to justify removal in this case.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [18-1] is GRANTED; therefore,
(2) This case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court of Leflore County, Mississippi from whence it came; and
(3) This case is CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.