From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate of Barrett, v. City of Vallejo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2015
2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)

Opinion


ESTATE OF ANTON BARRETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF VALLEJO, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD United States District Court, Eastern District of California January 28, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         Defendants have filed a motion for order shortening time for hearing on a motion to compel attendance of a subpoenaed non-party witness Stacey Madkins at deposition. Good ca appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Defendant’s motion for order shortening time (ECF No. 17) is granted.

         2. Hearing on defendants’ motion to compel is set for hearing on February 4, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24. Opposition, if any, shall be filed no later than February 2, 201 at 12:00 p.m. Non-party witness Stacey Madkins is cautioned that failure to file opposition an appear at the hearing may result in an order of contempt and/or sanctions issued against her.

         3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Stacey Madkins, 915 Waterford Ave., Stockton, CA 95206.


Summaries of

Estate of Barrett, v. City of Vallejo

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 28, 2015
2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)
Case details for

Estate of Barrett, v. City of Vallejo

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF ANTON BARRETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 28, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-0846 JAM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2015)