From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Estate, Engskow v. Cullen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1983
428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-489.

March 23, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Paul M. Marko, III, J.

Stephen W. Toothaker of Toothaker Sidweber, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Richard L. Polin, Fort Lauderdale, and Raymond J. Posgay, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


The trial court properly found that appellant failed to present competent substantial evidence of a boundary dispute or uncertainty, an essential element of appellant's affirmative defenses to ejectment of boundary by agreement or boundary by acquiescence. See King v. Carden, 237 So.2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Brooks v. Fletcher, 393 So.2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); and Seddon v. Edmondson, 411 So.2d 995 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982). Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment of ejectment.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY and DELL, JJ., and H. MARK PURDY, Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Estate, Engskow v. Cullen

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1983
428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Estate, Engskow v. Cullen

Case Details

Full title:ESTATE OF MYRA ENGSKOW, APPELLANT, v. PETER CULLEN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 23, 1983

Citations

428 So. 2d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)