From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Essman v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 16, 2009
No. 09-4001-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 16, 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-4001-SAC.

December 16, 2009


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The court referred this administrative appeal to the United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation. The Magistrate Judge filed a report and recommendation on November 25, 2009, clearly stating the parties' right to file written objections to the recommendation within ten days. Ten days have passed and no written objections have been filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The court has reviewed the report and recommendation, as well as the relevant pleadings in this case. Based upon this review and the absence of any filed objections, the court accepts the report and recommendation and adopts it as the ruling of this court, reversing and remanding this case pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Essman v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Kansas
Dec 16, 2009
No. 09-4001-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 16, 2009)
Case details for

Essman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM ESSMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: Dec 16, 2009

Citations

No. 09-4001-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Astrue

211 Fed. Appx. at 741. See Essman v. Astrue, Case No. 09-4001-SAC (D. Kan. Dec. 16, 2009, Doc. 23 at 14-16)…

Hicks v. Astrue

The court would note that the ALJ found plaintiff not fully credible because there was a gap in treatment…