From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Essex v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 1, 2020
462 P.3d 256 (Nev. 2020)

Opinion

No. 80500

05-01-2020

Richard Earl ESSEX, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

TCM Law Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


TCM Law

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order finding appellant competent to proceed with criminal adjudication. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.

This court's review of this appeal revealed a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court decision and order finding appellant competent to proceed with adjudication. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). This court issued an order to show cause, appellant filed a response to the order to show cause, and respondent filed a reply to the response.

Appellant acknowledges that no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a decision regarding a competency determination, but argues that this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on equitable grounds. Respondent notes that equitable principles will not justify a court's disregard of statutory requirements. See Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 878, 34 P.3d 519, 531 (2001). We lack jurisdiction and

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Essex v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 1, 2020
462 P.3d 256 (Nev. 2020)
Case details for

Essex v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD EARL ESSEX, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 1, 2020

Citations

462 P.3d 256 (Nev. 2020)