Espritt v. Saesee

Full title: BRIAN ESPRITT, Plaintiff, v. A. SAESEE, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 26, 2013

1:11-cv-00519-AWI-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2013)

Opinion

1:11-cv-00519-AWI-GSA-PC

04-26-2013

BRIAN ESPRITT, Plaintiff, v. A. SAESEE, et al., Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 23.)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTIVE

RELIEF

(Doc. 21.)

Brian Espritt ("Plaintiff") a civil detainee at Atascadero State Hospital in Atascadero, California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 7, 2013, findings and recommendations were entered, recommending that Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations within thirty days. On March 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed what amounts to a notice of non-opposition to the findings and recommendations (Doc. 24.)

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued by the Magistrate Judge on March 7, 2013, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief, filed on March 1, 2013, is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE