From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esposito v. Chestnut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 18, 2020
18 CIVIL 11245 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 11245 (PGG)

05-18-2020

LUIS CASTAGNA ESPOSITO, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, individually and As a partner of CHESTNUT, L.L.P., and WILLIE GRAY, individually and as a partner of WILLIAMS ARENTI, LEWIS & WATSON LLC


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 16, 2020, Judge Wang's R&R is adopted in part as set forth in the Order, Defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 23, 29) are granted; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Dated: New York, New York

May 18, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Esposito v. Chestnut

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 18, 2020
18 CIVIL 11245 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Esposito v. Chestnut

Case Details

Full title:LUIS CASTAGNA ESPOSITO, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, individually…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 18, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 11245 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y. May. 18, 2020)