From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espirit v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 2, 2000
750 So. 2d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D00-66.

Opinion filed February 2, 2000.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Michael A. Genden, Judge, L.T. No. 99-2102.

Curtis Espirit, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE and LEVY, JJ.


Appellant filed a two-page conclusory motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 which did not explain the basis for any of appellant's claims. The motion was properly denied. On appeal, defendant has filed a forty-six page brief which outlines his position, but the arguments he now makes were never made to the trial court. Accordingly we do not consider them.

This affirmance is without prejudice to the appellant to refile a proper Rule 3.850 motion. In so saying, we do not express any opinion on the merits of appellant's claims.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Espirit v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 2, 2000
750 So. 2d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Espirit v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS ESPIRIT, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 2, 2000

Citations

750 So. 2d 150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)