From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. Youngblood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01520-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-cv-01520-DLB PC

02-11-2013

JAMES SANTIAGO ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Plaintiff James Santiago Espinoza is a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on September 14, 2012. Plaintiff did not pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and on October 30, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to do so within forty-five days. More than forty-five days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Plaintiff was warned that failure to obey the order would result in dismissal of the action.

A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff has submitted neither and has not responded to the Court's order to do so, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS this action dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Espinoza v. Youngblood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
Case No. 1:12-cv-01520-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Espinoza v. Youngblood

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SANTIAGO ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. DONNY YOUNGBLOOD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-cv-01520-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)