From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinoza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Feb 7, 2007
No. 10-06-00282-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2007)

Opinion

No. 10-06-00282-CR

February 7, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 34,443.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice VANCE, and Justice REYNA.


ABATEMENT ORDER


Appellant's brief was due on or before December 22, 2006. On December 29, 2006, we sent a letter to Appellant's counsel about this due date and stated that unless a brief or satisfactory response was received within ten days, the Court would abate this appeal and order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing. To date, no brief or response has been filed. A majority of the Court abates this cause to the trial court with instructions to hold a hearing to determine: (1) why a proper brief has not been filed on Appellant's behalf; (2) whether Appellant's attorney has abandoned the appeal; and (3) whether Appellant still desires to proceed with the appeal; and (4) whether Appellant desires to represent himself. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2); Fewins v. State, 170 S.W.3d 293 (Tex.App.-Waco 2005, order) ( Fewins contains an extended discussion of these issues). The trial court shall conduct the hearing within thirty days after the date of this order. The trial court clerk and court reporter shall file supplemental records within forty-five days after the date of this order. See Fewins, 170 S.W.3d at 296-97. Appeal abated


Summaries of

Espinoza v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Feb 7, 2007
No. 10-06-00282-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2007)
Case details for

Espinoza v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ESPINOZA, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Feb 7, 2007

Citations

No. 10-06-00282-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2007)