From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Espinosa v. Stogner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2017
Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC

11-29-2017

BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA, AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH STOGNER, et al., Defendant


ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 40)

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate (ECF No. 40) entered on October 17, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court deny Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29). The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby,

ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No.40). /// /// ///

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is DENIED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES


Summaries of

Espinosa v. Stogner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 29, 2017
Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Espinosa v. Stogner

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN W. ESPINOSA, AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

Case No.: 3:16-CV-00141-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2017)