Opinion
CV 22-05880-SPG(JPRx)
10-28-2022
Tifanny Espino et al v. Regents of The University of California et al
Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).
The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before November 11, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiffs) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
Defendant(s) Regents of The University of California, Christopher Coria, and Lourdes Espino did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiffs) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiffs) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED