From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Esperum v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court
May 30, 1984
297 Or. 222 (Or. 1984)

Opinion


681 P.2d 792 (Or. 1984) 297 Or. 222 Keith D. ESPERUM, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Robert GHOLSTON, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Bruce GRESS, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Raymond C. ALEXANDER, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Jimmie Carl HALL, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Irving S. WISE, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. John D. LEFTRIDGE, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Michael McINROE, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Michael ST. MARTIN, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Donald G. SAGER, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Robbin O. BORDERS, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Daniel J. McSORLEY, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Tracy Rae ELLIOTT, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Mark K. KNUTSON, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent on Review. Nos. A28445; A28463; A28321; A28308; A29149; A29278; A28402; A28338; A28394; A28831; A28306; A28744; A28406; A28656; S30136; S30138; S30208; S20155; S30137; S30135; S30139; S30167; S30149; S30168; S30154; S30166; D30140 and S30182. Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc May 30, 1984

       Submitted on Petitioner's Petition for Rehearing May 7, 1984.

        Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, and Gary D. Babcock, Salem, filed the petition for rehearing for petitioners on review.

       No appearance contra.

MEMORANDUM OPINION.

       A review of the Board of Parole orders setting initial release dates pursuant to ORS 144.120(1) reveals that, in the case of petitioner Borders, the Chairman of the Board was not present at the original hearing on March 9, 1983. However, the chairman concurred in the action of three of the members of the Board on March 18, 1983, to override the minimum sentence imposed by the trial court. Because her vote was necessary for this order to become final, the correct date of the order setting the initial parole release date for Borders was March 18, 1983. Petitioner Borders filed for judicial review on May 14, 1983. Therefore, because Borders' petition for judicial review was filed within the 60-day period provided by ORS 144.335(2), it should not have been dismissed as untimely filed by the Court of Appeals.

       Petitioner Borders' petition for judicial review is reinstated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for disposition on the merits.


Summaries of

Esperum v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court
May 30, 1984
297 Or. 222 (Or. 1984)
Case details for

Esperum v. Board of Parole

Case Details

Full title:KEITH D. ESPERUM, Petitioner on Review, v. OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE…

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: May 30, 1984

Citations

297 Or. 222 (Or. 1984)
297 Or. 222
681 P.2d 793

Citing Cases

Walker v. Board of Parole

Moreover, an order on administrative review was not judicially reviewable, see Cruz v. Board of Parole,…

Jenkins v. Board of Parole

Under the law before the 1989 amendment to ORS 144.335, the time within which to file a petition for judicial…