From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eskridge v. Chase

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 28, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV727 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:07CV727.

September 28, 2007


ORDER


The Court has been advised this action has settled. Therefore, it is not necessary the action remain on the calendar of the Court.

IT IS ORDERED this action is closed. It shall be marked settled and dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to (1) vacate this Order and reopen the action upon cause shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary or (2) alter the terms of settlement and dismissal upon agreement of the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Eskridge v. Chase

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 28, 2007
CASE NO. 1:07CV727 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Eskridge v. Chase

Case Details

Full title:AMBER ESKRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. JP MORGAN CHASE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 28, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 1:07CV727 (N.D. Ohio Sep. 28, 2007)