From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escobar v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 17, 2021
20 CIVIL 9653 (AT)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 9653 (AT)(KHP)

06-17-2021

JEANNETTE ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Stipulation and Order dated June 16, 2021, that this action be, and hereby is, remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), in connection with the Supreme Court's decision in Carr v. Saul, 141 S.Ct. 1352(2021), in which the Court held that a claimant need not raise an Appointments Clause claim before the Social Security Administration, but may instead present it for the first time in federal court. On remand, the case will be assigned to a different administrative law judge ("ALJ") to further evaluate plaintiffs claims, plaintiff will be offered the opportunity for a hearing, and the ALJ will issue a new decision. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses.


Summaries of

Escobar v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jun 17, 2021
20 CIVIL 9653 (AT)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Escobar v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:JEANNETTE ESCOBAR, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jun 17, 2021

Citations

20 CIVIL 9653 (AT)(KHP) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 17, 2021)