From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Escobar v. Gaines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 13, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-994 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:11-cv-994

01-13-2012

ANGEL ENRIQUE NUNEZ ESCOBAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LEE GAINES, et al., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, Matthew J. Piers* Jose Jorge Behar* Jenna L. Miara* HUGHES SOCOL PIERS RESNICK & DYM, LTD. On behalf of Attorneys for Plaintiffs Andre Segura* Lee Gelernt* American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project Tricia Herzfeld (BPR #026014) Legal Director ACLU Foundation of Tennessee Cecillia D. Wang* American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project Justin Cox* American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Immigrants' Rights Project * pro hac vice admission Elliott Ozment (BPR #4331) R. Andrew Free (BPR #30513) Law Offices of Elliott Ozment ACLU-TN Cooperating Attorneys Kevin C. Klein Allison L. Bussell Assistant Metropolitan Attorneys William G. McCaskill, Jr. LeVan, Sprader, Patton & McCaskill Richard C. Mangelsdorf, Jr. Brian F. Walthart Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan, PLLC S. Delk Kennedy, Jr. Assistant United States Attorney Steve Orvhall Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. ICE Brian Abrahamson Bradley Epley Christopher Koshar Lee Gaines Eric Lim Lee Worsham Christopher Lane Patrick Hubbard Wayne Dickey Jonathon Hendrix Stephen McCormick


ORDER:

Motion denied.


U.S. Magistrate Judge

Chief Judge Campbell

Magistrate Judge Bryant


PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND MODIFY THE COURT'S ORDER

GRANTING DEFENDANTS AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER

COMPLAINT

This Court should reconsider and modify its Order dated January 10, 2012 (Docket No. 103) ("Order") which granted twelve defendants —Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents sued in the their individual capacities —a 45-day extension of time to file their response to the Complaint. The request for an extension of time was filed after the time to respond had expired and after Plaintiffs had filed motions for entry of default. This Court ruled on the request without the benefit of a response from Plaintiffs. This Court should reconsider its Order to consider evidence not previously presented to the Court, and also modify its Order to prevent manifest injustice.

The request for extension of time did not establish that the defendants' failure to act was the result of excusable neglect, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B). Indeed, the request failed to give any reason for the untimely filing. Moreover, a 45-day extension of time will cause Plaintiffs significant prejudice, substantially delay the litigation, and is not warranted.

Accordingly, and as outlined in more detail in the memorandum of law filed contemporaneously with this motion, Plaintiffs respectfully move this court to reconsider and modify its Order.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

Matthew J. Piers*

Jose Jorge Behar*

Jenna L. Miara*

HUGHES SOCOL PIERS RESNICK & DYM, LTD.

On behalf of Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Andre Segura*

Lee Gelernt*

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation

Immigrants' Rights Project

Tricia Herzfeld (BPR #026014)

Legal Director

ACLU Foundation of Tennessee

Cecillia D. Wang*

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation

Immigrants' Rights Project

Justin Cox*

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation

Immigrants' Rights Project

* pro hac vice admission

Elliott Ozment (BPR #4331)

R. Andrew Free (BPR #30513)

Law Offices of Elliott Ozment

ACLU-TN Cooperating Attorneys

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 13, 2012, a copy of the foregoing documents was filed electronically. Parties may access this filing through the Court's electronic filing system. Notice of this filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all the following parties:

Kevin C. Klein

Allison L. Bussell

Assistant Metropolitan Attorneys

William G. McCaskill, Jr.

LeVan, Sprader, Patton & McCaskill

Richard C. Mangelsdorf, Jr.

Brian F. Walthart

Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan, PLLC

S. Delk Kennedy, Jr.

Assistant United States Attorney

I hereby certify that on January 13, 2012, a copy of the foregoing documents was filed electronically. Parties may access this filing through the Court's electronic filing system. Notice of this filing will be sent by U.S. Mail to all the following parties:

Steve Orvhall

Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. ICE

Brian Abrahamson

Bradley Epley

Christopher Koshar

Lee Gaines

Eric Lim

Lee Worsham

Christopher Lane

Patrick Hubbard

Wayne Dickey

Jonathon Hendrix

Stephen McCormick

______________________

Jenna L. Miara


Summaries of

Escobar v. Gaines

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jan 13, 2012
No. 3:11-cv-994 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Escobar v. Gaines

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL ENRIQUE NUNEZ ESCOBAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LEE GAINES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

No. 3:11-cv-994 (M.D. Tenn. Jan. 13, 2012)