From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ESCHENBRENNER v. GUDE BROS., KIEFFER COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)

Opinion

May, 1922.


The privilege of inspection and discovery in case of this character is given to plaintiff almost as matter of right. ( Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494, 496.) We have reiterated this doctrine in Lockwood v. Bedell Co. ( 178 App. Div. 695). The order is, therefore, reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. Rich, Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

ESCHENBRENNER v. GUDE BROS., KIEFFER COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1922
202 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for

ESCHENBRENNER v. GUDE BROS., KIEFFER COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS J. ESCHENBRENNER, Appellant, v. GUDE BROS., KIEFFER COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1922

Citations

202 App. Div. 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)