From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erwin v. NYC Dept. of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2012
11 Civ. 2692 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2012)

Opinion

11 Civ. 2692 (DAB)

03-30-2012

RONALD ERWIN, Plaintiff, v. NYC DEPT. OF CORRECTION, ET AL., Defendants.


ADOPTION OF REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

DEBORAH A. BATTS, United States District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon the December 30, 2011 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James C. Francis ("Report"). Judge Francis' Report recommends that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Report, 1-2.)

"Within fourteen days after being served with a copy [of a Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); accord 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court may adopt those portions of the report to which no timely objection has been made, so long as there is no clear error on the face of the record. Wilds v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 262 F.Supp.2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003). "[F]ailure to object timely to a magistrate's report operates as a waiver of any further judicial review of the magistrate's decision." Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604 (2d Cir. 2008) (quoting Small v. Sec, of HHS, 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989)). This rule applies to pro se parties so long as the magistrate's report "explicitly states that failure to object to the report within [fourteen (14)] days will preclude appellate review..." Small, 892 F.2d at 16.

Despite being advised of the procedure for filing objections in Judge Francis' Report, and warned that failure to file objections would waive objections and preclude appellate review, (Report at 2), no Party has filed objections to the Report.

Having reviewed the Report, and finding no clear error on the face of the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James C. Francis, dated December 30, 2011, be and the same hereby is APPROVED, ADOPTED, and RATIFIED by the Court in its entirety. Plaintiff's Complaint is HEREBY DISMISSED, without prejudice.

SO ORDERED. DATED: March 30, 2012

New York, New York

___________

Deborah A. Batts

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Erwin v. NYC Dept. of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 30, 2012
11 Civ. 2692 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Erwin v. NYC Dept. of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD ERWIN, Plaintiff, v. NYC DEPT. OF CORRECTION, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 30, 2012

Citations

11 Civ. 2692 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2012)