From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erwin v. Ahlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-00050-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:18-cv-00050-SAB (PC)

05-07-2018

JOEY ERWIN, Plaintiff, v. PAM AHLIN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS, AND REFERRING MATTER BACK TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR INITIATION OF SERVICE OF PROCESS (ECF Nos. 10, 11)

Plaintiff Joey Erwin, a civil detainee, is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations recommending that certain claims be dismissed for failure to state a claim. The findings and recommendations was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days from the date of service. On May 2, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice informing the Court that he wished to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable in the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations, filed April 5, 2018, is ADOPTED IN FULL;

2 This action shall proceed on Plaintiff's first amended complaint, filed March 26, 2018, against Defendants Ahlin and Price in their official capacity for a condition of confinement and deprivation of property claim based on the ban on ownership of electronic devices and items;

3. All other claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim;

4. Plaintiff's request for declaratory relief is dismissed; and

5. The matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for initiation of service of process.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 7 , 2018

/s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Erwin v. Ahlin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 7, 2018
Case No. 1:18-cv-00050-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2018)
Case details for

Erwin v. Ahlin

Case Details

Full title:JOEY ERWIN, Plaintiff, v. PAM AHLIN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 7, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:18-cv-00050-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2018)