From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erny v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 9, 1940
290 N.W. 427 (Minn. 1940)

Opinion

No. 32,383.

February 9, 1940.

Municipal corporation — trimming trees along telephone and power lines — powers of city.

An ordinance of the city of St. Paul under which the city officers employ city employes in trimming trees along telephone and electric power lines and charge the expense thereof to the utilities involved is within the powers conferred by the welfare clause of the city charter. We find substantial compliance with the ordinance.

Action in the district court for Ramsey county for an injunction against defendant city and its officers to restrain as an unauthorized municipal activity the trimming of trees along power and telephone lines and billing the expense to the utility companies. After findings for defendants, Carlton F. McNally, Judge, plaintiff appealed from the judgment. Affirmed.

S.W. Jensch, for appellant.

John W. McConneloug and Louis P. Sheahan, for respondents.



This is a suit for an injunction to restrain the city and its officers from trimming trees along power and telephone lines and billing the expense to the utility companies involved. The plaintiff claims that the practice sought to be enjoined is an unauthorized municipal activity. The defense claims authority under the general welfare clause and an ordinance passed pursuant thereto. The trial court sustained the defense. We think the ordinance authorizing the activity was well within the welfare clause, and the city was justified under that clause in protecting the trees along its streets and boulevards and in protecting its citizens by this ordinance from the hazards involved both in the extension of the wires through the branches of the trees and in the operation of trimming. It might well take the matter into its own hands and control and charge the expense thereof to the utilities rather than to risk proper measures being taken by the utilities under its supervision. In our opinion there was substantial compliance with the ordinance. The plaintiff comes here as a taxpayer seeking to restrain what he claims is an unauthorized practice.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Erny v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 9, 1940
290 N.W. 427 (Minn. 1940)
Case details for

Erny v. City of St. Paul

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR A. ERNY v. CITY OF ST. PAUL AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 9, 1940

Citations

290 N.W. 427 (Minn. 1940)
290 N.W. 427