From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ernst Young v. Simpson

U.S.
May 27, 1997
520 U.S. 1248 (1997)

Summary

Permitting corporations to be represented by their non-attorney chief executive officer/controlling shareholder in criminal proceedings violated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel even though the officer/shareholder was permitted to proceed pro se on the criminal charges lodged against him.

Summary of this case from Spirit of the A. Min. v. Commonwealth

Opinion

No. 96-1553.

May 27, 1997, October TERM, 1996.


C.A. 6th Cir. Motions of 16 law firms and Arthur Anderson LLP et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 100 F. 3d 436.


Summaries of

Ernst Young v. Simpson

U.S.
May 27, 1997
520 U.S. 1248 (1997)

Permitting corporations to be represented by their non-attorney chief executive officer/controlling shareholder in criminal proceedings violated the Sixth Amendment right to counsel even though the officer/shareholder was permitted to proceed pro se on the criminal charges lodged against him.

Summary of this case from Spirit of the A. Min. v. Commonwealth
Case details for

Ernst Young v. Simpson

Case Details

Full title:ERNST YOUNG v. SIMPSON

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 27, 1997

Citations

520 U.S. 1248 (1997)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Leggett

The components of the scheme work in combination, not isolation. They form a “sentencing package in which…

Ziegler v. Anesthesia Associates of Lancaster, LTD

This requirement has been viewed as a jurisdictional prerequisite. See Hukill v. Auto Care, Inc., 192 F.3d…