From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ernest J. Michel Co., Inc. v. Anabasis Trade, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 951 (N.Y. 1980)

Summary

enforcing arbitration clause contained in a confirmation of order form sent by the seller, where the form was signed by the buyer "with admitted knowledge that an arbitration clause was contained therein"

Summary of this case from POSH POOCH INC. v. ARGENTI

Opinion

Argued June 2, 1980

Decided June 24, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, XAVIER C. RICCOBONO, J.

Michael C. Wimpfheimer and Henry Wimpfheimer for appellant.

Donald L. Kreindler and Michael D. Blutrich for respondent.

Kurt J. Wolff and Daniel Wallen for American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc., amicus curiae. Cecil A. Citron and Michael Wexelbaum for Lawyers Association of the Textile Industry, amicus curiae.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that appellant buyer, by its affirmative actions, agreed to submit all disputes arising out of the contracts in issue to arbitration. An agreement to arbitrate was manifested by appellant by signing the first confirmation of order form with admitted knowledge that an arbitration clause was contained therein and, thereafter, by receiving and retaining six additional confirmations of orders on the same contract form without objection except for a request for one change as to credit terms, which change was made by the respondent seller. (See Uniform Commercial Code, § 2-204, subd [1]; Schubtex, Inc. v Allen Snyder, Inc., 49 N.Y.2d 1.)

Matter of Marlene Inds. Corp. (Carnac Textiles) ( 45 N.Y.2d 327) is clearly distinguishable. There, contradictory contract forms were exchanged between the parties; neither party had signed the other's form and no evidence existed that the recipient of the contract containing the arbitration clause was aware of its presence or had agreed to arbitrate.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum; Judge GABRIELLI concurs on constraint of Schubtex, Inc. v Allen Snyder, Inc. ( 49 N.Y.2d 1).

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Ernest J. Michel Co., Inc. v. Anabasis Trade, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 24, 1980
50 N.Y.2d 951 (N.Y. 1980)

enforcing arbitration clause contained in a confirmation of order form sent by the seller, where the form was signed by the buyer "with admitted knowledge that an arbitration clause was contained therein"

Summary of this case from POSH POOCH INC. v. ARGENTI
Case details for

Ernest J. Michel Co., Inc. v. Anabasis Trade, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST J. MICHEL CO., INC., Appellant, v. ANABASIS TRADE, INC., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 24, 1980

Citations

50 N.Y.2d 951 (N.Y. 1980)
431 N.Y.S.2d 459
409 N.E.2d 933

Citing Cases

St. Charles Cable TV, Inc. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc.

Except for the warranty term, no such manifestations of knowledge and assent to the terms in Eagle's form…

POSH POOCH INC. v. ARGENTI

This case is also distinguishable from the decisions cited by Defendant, in which courts enforced a material…