From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Erlec v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2009
58 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-00991, Docket No. V-18840-05.

January 20, 2009.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Modica, J.), dated January 8, 2008, which dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the state of Illinois is a more appropriate and convenient forum.

Helene Bernstein, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Yisroel Schulman, New York, N.Y. (Christina Brandt-Young of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Carni and Dickerson, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion, after reviewing the appropriate factors, in declining to exercise jurisdiction of this matter because the state of Illinois is a more appropriate and convenient forum ( see Domestic Relations Law § 76-f; Matter of Eisner v Eisner, 44 AD3d 1111, 1113; Matter of Hall v Hall, 44 AD3d 771; Clark v Clark, 21 AD3d 1326, 1327).

The father's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Erlec v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 20, 2009
58 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Erlec v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NORBERT ERLEC, Appellant, v. MARGARET JOHNSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 20, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 381
870 N.Y.S.2d 795

Citing Cases

Uvaydov v. Wexley

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The Supreme Court providently…

TZ v. SZ

Considering the above factors, the Court concludes that New York is an inconvenient forum and that…