From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ergowerx International LLC v. Maxell Corp. of America

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 11, 2015
615 F. App'x 689 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2014-1641

09-11-2015

ERGOWERX INTERNATIONAL LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MAXELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee

JAY P. NELKIN, Nelkin & Nelkin, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. HILARY L. PRESTON, Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by AJEET P. PAI, Austin, TX; NICKOU OSKOUI, Dallas, TX.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:13-cv-05633-PAE, Judge Paul A. Engelmayer.

JUDGMENT

JAY P. NELKIN, Nelkin & Nelkin, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. HILARY L. PRESTON, Vinson & Elkins LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by AJEET P. PAI, Austin, TX; NICKOU OSKOUI, Dallas, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 11, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Ergowerx International LLC v. Maxell Corp. of America

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 11, 2015
615 F. App'x 689 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Ergowerx International LLC v. Maxell Corp. of America

Case Details

Full title:ERGOWERX INTERNATIONAL LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MAXELL CORPORATION OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 11, 2015

Citations

615 F. App'x 689 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Guangzhou Yongjia Garment Mfg. Co. v. Zoomers Inc.

Alienage jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties. Ergowerx Int'l, LLC v. Maxell Corp. of…

Girotto v. Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings

Given the case's early stage, and the corresponding lack of discovery, the Court declines to exercise…