Opinion
No. ED 110294
02-21-2023
DaJuan M. ERBY, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Stephanie A. Hoeplinger, 1010 Market Street, Suite, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Alex D. Beezley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.
Stephanie A. Hoeplinger, 1010 Market Street, Suite, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.
Alex D. Beezley, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM. DaJuan M. Erby (Movant) appeals from the motion court's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order denying his amended Rule 24.035 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant contends the motion court erred in denying his motion because he alleged facts, not refuted by the record, establishing that his plea counsel pressured him into pleading guilty, thereby rendering his pleas involuntary. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude no reversible error occurred. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b) (2022).