From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ERBE v. BILLETER

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-113 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2006)

Summary

dismissing plaintiff's completely preempted state law claims but granting leave to file an amended complaint bringing claims for relief under ERISA

Summary of this case from Yerke v. Aetna

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-113.

November 3, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on January 27, 2006 by way of Notice of Removal from the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed on October 16, 2006, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 6) filed by Defendants be granted and the case be dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Brian Billeter; that Plaintiff be granted leave to file an amended complaint to assert a claim or claims under Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), and/or federal common law claims under ERISA, as to Defendants Connecticut General and Brian Billeter, within twenty (20) days from the date of the Memorandum Order adopting this Report and Recommendation; that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted and the case dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant CIGNA Group Insurance; and that Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's jury demand and to dismiss Plaintiff's request for punitive and/or extracontractual damages (Doc. No. 6) be granted. Service was made on counsel of record for all parties. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2006,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 6) filed by Defendants is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Brian Billeter.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED as to Defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Brian Billeter. Plaintiff is hereby directed to file an amended complaint asserting a claim or claims under Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a), and/or federal common law claims under ERISA, within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED and the case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant CIGNA Group Insurance.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's jury demand and to dismiss Plaintiff's request for punitive and/or extracontractual damages (Doc. No. 6) is GRANTED.

The report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated October 16, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

ERBE v. BILLETER

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-113 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2006)

dismissing plaintiff's completely preempted state law claims but granting leave to file an amended complaint bringing claims for relief under ERISA

Summary of this case from Yerke v. Aetna
Case details for

ERBE v. BILLETER

Case Details

Full title:MARY KAREN ERBE, Executrix of the Estate of Edward Erbe, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-113 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2006)

Citing Cases

Yerke v. Aetna

Upon finding that state law claims are completely preempted, the Court can either convert them into federal…

Taza Sys., LLC v. Taza 21 Co.

15 U.S.C. § 1058. This Court can take judicial notice of Patent & Trademark Office filings. Old Reliable…