From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Equilease Corporation v. Clifford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 1971
251 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. 71-438.

July 27, 1971.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John J. Kehoe, J.

Smith, Mandler, Smith Parker, Joe N. Unger, Miami Beach, for appellant.

E.N. Stephens, Pensacola, for appellees.

Before SWANN, C.J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.


Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks interlocutory review of an order of the trial court transferring venue of the cause to the Circuit Court, First Judicial Circuit in and for Escambia County, Florida. The action in the trial court sought damages for breach of a lease. The order reads in part as follows:

* * * * * *

"This Court finds that the Defendant is a resident of Escambia County, Florida, and has a right under Florida Statute 47.011, F.S.A. to be sued in the County where he resides, and therefore the Defendant's Motion to transfer be and the same is hereby granted."

* * * * * *

This is error. The plaintiff has the option to choose the forum; not the defendant. And, if the cause of action arises in Dade County, he has a right to elect to proceed in the courts of said County. See: Greyhound Corporation v. Rosart, Fla.App. 1960, 124 So.2d 708, wherein the following is found:

* * * * * *

"In Florida, the election of venue is with the plaintiff and although it may be more convenient to the defendant and possibly to the plaintiff that the action be prosecuted in another county or circuit, nevertheless, if the election is one which the plaintiff has properly exercised under the statute, then the election still remains his and not one which can be dictated by the defendant. * * * To hold otherwise would be to nullify the venue statute which gives the plaintiff the right to file his action in a particular place under certain specified conditions."

* * * * * *

Therefore, the order here under review be and the same is hereby reversed with directions to proceed with the matter.

The applicability of the doctrine of forum non conveniens, as recognized by § 47.122, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., was not presented in the trial court nor is the applicability of the doctrine reflected in the proceedings revealed by the record on appeal.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.


Summaries of

Equilease Corporation v. Clifford

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 27, 1971
251 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Equilease Corporation v. Clifford

Case Details

Full title:EQUILEASE CORPORATION, A SUBSIDIARY OF ELTRA CORP., A NEW YORK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 27, 1971

Citations

251 So. 2d 40 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

Warren Bros. Co. v. Joslin

First, the plaintiff has the option of choosing the forum, not the defendant. Equilease Corporation v.…

Marshall v. Upson

The trial court heard oral argument and entered the order herein appealed. The uncontroverted facts as…