From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Environmental Safety v. Auburn Enlarged City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 16, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Cayuga County, Contiguglia, J.

Present — Denman, J.P., Green, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its complaint, which seeks a return of its bid security in the sum of $70,530, together with interest. We disagree with defendant's contention that plaintiff forfeited its bid security notwithstanding that defendant, within 45 days after the formal bid opening, awarded and executed a contract for the subject work to another bidder. Accordingly, pursuant to the language of subparagraph 4.2.3 of the supplementary instructions to bidders, defendant was obligated to return plaintiff's bid security "within forty-eight (48) hours after [defendant] and the accepted Bidder have executed the Contract".


Summaries of

Environmental Safety v. Auburn Enlarged City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 16, 1990
167 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Environmental Safety v. Auburn Enlarged City

Case Details

Full title:ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND CONTROL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. AUBURN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 876 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
561 N.Y.S.2d 972

Citing Cases

Ecolono v. Division of Reimbursements

The State sued to recover that portion of the benefits equal to the cost of services rendered to her son…