finding that hearsay evidence, which is inadmissable at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment
Summary of this case from Parents, Alumni, Taylor School v. City of NorfolkNo. 91-276.
November 4, 1991.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 933 F. 2d 449.
finding that hearsay evidence, which is inadmissable at trial, cannot be considered on a motion for summary judgment
Summary of this case from Parents, Alumni, Taylor School v. City of Norfolkrejecting challenge to minority business enterprise law on other grounds, but noting State study documenting discrimination to support legislative findings underlying law
Summary of this case from 83 Op. Att'y Gen. 3providing that the factors a court should consider when evaluating a veil-piercing claim are the amount of respect given to the separate identity of the corporation by its shareholders; the fraudulent intent of the incorporators; and the degree of injustice visited on the litigants by respecting the corporate entity
Summary of this case from Howerton v. Bluestone Industries, Inc.non-settling defendant has right of contribution under ERISA
Summary of this case from Duncan v. SantanielloFull title:ENVIRODYNE INDUSTRIES, Inc. v. LUMPKIN et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Nov 4, 1991
Fisons, 30 F.3d at 472-73, 31 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1596. Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Products, Inc., 930 F.2d…
A H Sportswear v. Victoria's Secret St.After an exhaustive review of the record and thorough consideration of the parties' arguments, we apply this…