Opinion
2016-1287
03-20-2017
ENOVA TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellant v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC., SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, Appellees
DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHAO WANG; JANICE TA, Austin, TX. DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by LUCAS J. TOMSICH, JULIE WAHLSTRAND; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA; RICHARD M. MARSH, JR., Denver, CO.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00683.
JUDGMENT
DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHAO WANG; JANICE TA, Austin, TX. DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellees. Also represented by LUCAS J. TOMSICH, JULIE WAHLSTRAND; CALVIN L. LITSEY, East Palo Alto, CA; RICHARD M. MARSH, JR., Denver, CO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 20, 2017
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court