From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ennabe v. Manosa

California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division
Dec 20, 2010
No. B222784 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2010)

Opinion


FAIEZ ENNABE, Individually and as Administrator, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CARLOS MANOSA et al., Defendants and Respondents. B222784 California Court of Appeal, Second District, First Division December 20, 2010

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KC053945

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

It is ordered that the opinion filed on December 1, 2010, be modified as follows:

On page 3, the fourth and fifth sentences of the second paragraph of the Background section are deleted and replaced with the following sentence:

Earlier in the day, Manosa provided money to purchase beer, tequila, and rum.

Appellants’ petition for rehearing is denied.

There is no change in the judgment.

MALLANO, P. J. CHANEY, J. JOHNSON, J.


Summaries of

Ennabe v. Manosa

California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division
Dec 20, 2010
No. B222784 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Ennabe v. Manosa

Case Details

Full title:FAIEZ ENNABE, Individually and as Administrator, etc., et al., Plaintiffs…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, First Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2010

Citations

No. B222784 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2010)