From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

England v. Schrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2013
C-1-11-93 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

C-1-11-93

02-27-2013

TISHA ENGLAND, et al. Plaintiffs v. POLICE OFFICER RYAN SCHRAND, Defendant


ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 28) and plaintiff's objections thereto (doc. no. 29) and defendant's response (doc. no. 30). The Magistrate Judge concluded that defendant is entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claims. The Magistrate Judge, therefore, recommended that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 24) be granted.

Plaintiff objects to the Judge's Report and Recommendation on the grounds that his findings are contrary to law.

CONCLUSION

Upon a de novo review of the record, especially in light of plaintiff's objections, the Court finds that plaintiff's objections have either been adequately addressed and properly disposed of by the Judge or present no particularized arguments that warrant specific responses by this Court. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge has accurately set forth the controlling principles of law and properly applied them to the particular facts of this case and agrees with the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS AND INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE HEREIN the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 28). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. no. 24) is GRANTED.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Court CERTIFIES that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore deny plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F .3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).

This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

England v. Schrand

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 27, 2013
C-1-11-93 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

England v. Schrand

Case Details

Full title:TISHA ENGLAND, et al. Plaintiffs v. POLICE OFFICER RYAN SCHRAND, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

C-1-11-93 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 27, 2013)