From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Engert v. Stanislaus County

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 15, 2015
1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2015)

Opinion

          Richard H. Schoenberger, Spencer J. Pahlke, WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs IRINA ENGERT, ANNE ENGERT, and RON ENGERT.

          PORTER|SCOTT, PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Terence J. Cassidy, John R. Whitefleet, Lauren E. Calnero, Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, SHERIFF ADAM CHRISTIANSON and LIEUTENANT CLIFF HARPER.

          Jesse M. Rivera, Jill B. Nathan, RIVERA & ASSOCIATES, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendant SERGEANT MANUEL MARTINEZ.

          Sean D. O'Dowd, GOYETTE & ASSOCIATES, Gold River, CA, Attorney for Defendant SERGEANT MANUEL MARTINEZ.

          Bruce A. Kilday, Amie C. McTavish, ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF, LLP, Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendants DEPUTY MICHAEL GLINSKAS and ESTATE OF ROBERT PARIS, JR.


          STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; ORDER

          LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

         TO THE COURT, TO ALL PARTIES, AND TO THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

         Pursuant to Local Rule 143, Plaintiffs IRINA, RON and ANNE ENGERT ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, LIEUTENANT CLIFF HARPER, SERGEANT MANUEL MARTINEZ, DEPUTY MICHAEL GLINSKAS and the ESTATE OF DEPUTY ROBERT LEE PARIS ("Defendants"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Briefing on Defendants' three Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, is now complete.

         2. On April 17, 2015, the District Court issued a Minute Order vacating the hearing on the three for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication (Dckt. No. 191). The District Court took the Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication under submission pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 230(g).

         3. The Final Pretrial Conference is currently scheduled for June 25, 2015 before the Honorable District Court Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. In accordance with the Pretrial Scheduling Order and Standing Orders, counsel for the Parties have commenced their meet and confer effort regarding the Joint Pretrial Conference. In addition to the preparation of other trial related documents, by the Parties' calculation, Plaintiffs must transmit their draft Joint Pretrial Statement to Defendants on or before June 11, 2015. Defendants must complete their portion of the Joint Pretrial Statement and the Parties must finalize that document for filing no later than June 18, 2015.

         4. In light of the volume of the three Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication, the Oppositions and Replies thereto, and evidence submitted by the Parties in support of their respective positions, counsel for the Parties are cognizant that additional time may be necessary to complete review of those papers prior to the issuance of a ruling on the Motions by the District Court. Likewise, the Parties in good faith believe that the issuance of a ruling and Order on the three Motions for Summary Judgment would help define the scope of the claims and issues for the Parties to address as part of their preparation for the Final Pretrial Conference, including but not limited to preparation of the Joint Pretrial Statement, Jury Instructions, Motions in Limine and Exhibits and Exhibit Lists.

         5. Based on the above, the Parties stipulate to and request a short continuance of the Final Pretrial Conference to allow additional time for the issuance of an Order on the Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication. The Parties propose the following changes:

         Deadline Current Date: Proposed New Date: Plaintiffs" Draft Joint Pretrial June 11, 2015 June 25, 2015 Statement to be transmitted to Defendants Defendants' Draft Joint June 18, 2015 July 2, 2015 Pretrial Statement to be transmitted to Plaintiffs and filing of Joint Pretrial Statement with District Court Final Pretrial Conference June 25, 2015 July 9, 2015

          ORDER

         Having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference be continued to July 9, 2015. Plaintiffs will transmit their draft of the Joint Pretrial Statement on June 25, 2015. Defendants will transmit their modifications to the draft Joint Pretrial Statement on July 2, 2015, and the Joint Pretrial Statement will be filed no later than July 2, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Engert v. Stanislaus County

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 15, 2015
1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Engert v. Stanislaus County

Case Details

Full title:IRINA ENGERT, ANNE ENGERT, and RON ENGERT, Individually and as…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 15, 2015

Citations

1:13-CV-00126-LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal. May. 15, 2015)