From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Enciso v. Moon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00924-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00924-SKO PC

03-29-2013

CESAR ENCISO, Plaintiff, v. DR. MOON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO

SEND PLAINTIFF COPY OF RESPONSE,

REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SIGNED

RESPONSE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS, AND

STRIKING UNSIGNED RESPONSE


(Doc. 8)

Plaintiff Cesar Enciso, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on June 7, 2012. On March 7, 2013, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint and ordered him to either file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on his cognizable claims. On March 28, 2013, Plaintiff filed a response stating his willingness to proceed only on the claims found to be cognizable in the screening order. However, Plaintiff neglected to sign the response and the Court cannot consider unsigned filings. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); Local Rule 131.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk's Office shall send Plaintiff a copy of the unsigned response;
2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a signed response; and
3. The unsigned response, filed on March 28, 2013, is stricken from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Enciso v. Moon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 29, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00924-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Enciso v. Moon

Case Details

Full title:CESAR ENCISO, Plaintiff, v. DR. MOON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 29, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-00924-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2013)