From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 2, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-02703-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 2, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-02703-APG-NJK

12-02-2016

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, as well as his complaint. Docket Nos. 1, 2. Chief United States District Judge Gloria M. Navarro has twice declared Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. Emrit v. Ctrs. for Medicare and Medicaid Servs., No. 2:14-cv-1761-GMN-PAL, 2016 WL 164992, at *2 (D. Nev. Jan. 14, 2016); Emrit v. Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:14-cv-01760-GMN-PAL, 2015 WL 4597834, at *1 (D. Nev. July 29, 2015). Chief Judge Navarro therefore set forth a specific procedure that Plaintiff must follow in order to file any documents in this District. See Emrit, 2016 WL 164992, at *2; see also Emrit, 2015 WL 4597834, at *1. Plaintiff has failed to comply with those orders in the instant case. See Docket.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Further, the Court RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 2, 2016

/s/_________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE

Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2 any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be in writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within 14 days of service of this document. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). This Circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).


Summaries of

Emrit v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 2, 2016
Case No. 2:16-cv-02703-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Emrit v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 2, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-02703-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Dec. 2, 2016)