From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emmett v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 18, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-1581-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-1581-S-BH

08-18-2022

BARRY EMMETT TDCJ No. 1383329 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


ORDER

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. See ECF No. 32. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Petitioner's Objections, received on July 14, 2022 [ECF No. 31], is liberally construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and is DENIED

Considering the record in this case and pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b), Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 proceedings, and 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. The Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this case in support of its finding that Petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find “it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right” or “debatable whether [this Court] was correct in its procedural ruling.” Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §§ 2254 and 2255 Cases, as amended effective on December 1, 2009, reads as follows:

(a) Certificate of Appealability. The district court must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. Before entering the final order, the court may direct the parties to submit arguments on whether a certificate should issue. If the court issues a certificate, the court must state the specific issue or issues that satisfy the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). If the court denies a certificate, the parties may not appeal the denial but may seek a certificate from the court of appeals under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22. A motion to reconsider a denial does not extend the time to appeal.
(b) Time to Appeal. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a) governs the time to appeal an order entered under these rules. A timely notice of appeal must be filed even if the district court issues a certificate of appealability.

If Petitioner files a notice of appeal, he must pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Emmett v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Aug 18, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-1581-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Emmett v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:BARRY EMMETT TDCJ No. 1383329 v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-1581-S-BH (N.D. Tex. Aug. 18, 2022)