From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emerald Pack. v. Hygrade Food Prods

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 7, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 915 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)

Opinion

April 7, 1960

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MAX M. MELTZER, J.

Willkie Farr Gallagher Walton FitzGibbon ( Joseph M. Callahan, Mark F. Hughes and Warren G. MacKenzie of counsel), for appellant.

Sahn, Shapiro Epstein ( Milton E. Sahn and Morris Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.


A contract for the sale of 27,362 pounds of United States choice steers provided that the weight of the goods when packed governed all sales and no allowance would be made for natural shrinkage. When the shipment arrived in New York from Omaha there was found to be a difference of 185 pounds in the actual weight as against the invoice weight. However, since this shortage was due to natural shrinkage and was within the contemplation of a contract which the parties had a right to make, there was no violation of either section 193 Agric. Mkts. of the Agriculture and Markets Law, or section 833-16.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed in favor of the defendant, with costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Emerald Pack. v. Hygrade Food Prods

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Apr 7, 1960
23 Misc. 2d 915 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
Case details for

Emerald Pack. v. Hygrade Food Prods

Case Details

Full title:EMERALD PACKING CORPORATION, Respondent, v. HYGRADE FOOD PRODUCTS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1960

Citations

23 Misc. 2d 915 (N.Y. App. Term 1960)
200 N.Y.S.2d 534