From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Embla, LLC v. Rouf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0020 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0020 LKK GGH PS

02-27-2013

EMBLA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MOHAMMAD A. ROUF, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

On January 10, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed January 10, 2013, are ADOPTED and

1. This action is remanded to Sacramento County Superior Court;

2. The Clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the Sacramento County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (12UD09538) in the proof of service; and

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Embla, LLC v. Rouf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0020 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Embla, LLC v. Rouf

Case Details

Full title:EMBLA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MOHAMMAD A. ROUF, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0020 LKK GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)