From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ELY v. CURTIS

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1881
60 N.H. 513 (N.H. 1881)

Opinion

Decided June, 1881.

The fraud by which a debt is created, and a discharge of it prevented in bankruptcy, under U.S. Rev. St., s. 5117, is actual, and not mere fraud in law.

ASSUMPSIT. The plaintiff contended that the debt was not discharged in bankruptcy because created by the defendant's fraud. Facts found by a referee.

Barnard Barnard, for the plaintiff.

E. B. S. Sanborn, for the defendant.


The fraud must be actual, and not mere fraud in law. Neal v. Clark, 95 U.S. 704; Wolf v. Stix; 99 U.S. 1, 7. The referee has reported evidence, and has not decided the general question of fraud.

Case discharged.

STANLEY and BLODGETT, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.


Summaries of

ELY v. CURTIS

Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack
Jun 1, 1881
60 N.H. 513 (N.H. 1881)
Case details for

ELY v. CURTIS

Case Details

Full title:ELY v. CURTIS

Court:Supreme Court of New Hampshire Merrimack

Date published: Jun 1, 1881

Citations

60 N.H. 513 (N.H. 1881)

Citing Cases

Lund v. Bull

Mackel v. Rochester, 135 Fed. Rep. 904, 906. As a consequence of this change in the statute, it is now held…