From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

ELY v. BARRETT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

March, 1918.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.


Motion granted. This court makes the following finding, in addition to those of the trial court: The deviation from the route stated in the bill of lading was negligent, and the continuance of the transportation of the animal after its sickness was discovered at Pittsburg was a negligent act, and the failure to care for it at that point was a negligent omission, and by reason of such negligent acts and omission the liability of the defendant was established.


Summaries of

ELY v. BARRETT

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

ELY v. BARRETT

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD W. ELY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM M. BARRETT, as President of ADAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1918

Citations

183 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)