From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elwood v. Roof

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 9, 1880
82 N.Y. 428 (N.Y. 1880)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1880

Decided November 9, 1880

Samuel Hand for appellant. Nathaniel C. Moak for respondent.


The appeal to the General Term was from an order of the Special Term, directing judgment for the plaintiff on account of the frivolousness of the defendant's answer. An appeal lies to the General Term from such an order before the entry of judgment in pursuance thereof. In respect to an appeal to this court the rule is different.

The point that the direction appealed from is not an order, but a mere allocatur, is untenable. It is entitled as a Special Term order, and stated at foot to have been entered. It in effect adjudges the answer frivolous and the plaintiff to be entitled to judgment on the pleadings, and directs the entry of such judgment and a reference, etc.

The order of the General Term reversing the order of the Special Term is not appealable to this court. It was discretionary with the court below whether to pass upon the sufficiency of the answer on a motion for judgment, which is in substance a short demurrer, or to put the plaintiff to a regular demurrer.

The appeal should be dismissed with costs.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Elwood v. Roof

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 9, 1880
82 N.Y. 428 (N.Y. 1880)
Case details for

Elwood v. Roof

Case Details

Full title:REUBEN ELWOOD, Appellant, v . NANCY ROOF, Impleaded, etc., Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 9, 1880

Citations

82 N.Y. 428 (N.Y. 1880)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Thompson

But that case dealt with an order denying a motion for a new trial made before the entry of judgment, and has…

Halliday v. Barber

Parker v. Warth, 5 Hun, 417. Under the Code of Civil Procedure, it has been held by the Court of Appeals, in…