From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elwood v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 14, 2015
Civil No. 13-3645 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Civil No. 13-3645 (JRT/HB)

01-14-2015

ANDY LEROY ELWOOD, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Defendant.

Carol Louise Lewis, CAROL LEWIS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, 14 North Seventh Avenue, St. Cloud, MN 56303, for plaintiff, Ana Voss, Ann Bildtsen, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Carol Louise Lewis, CAROL LEWIS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, 14 North Seventh Avenue, St. Cloud, MN 56303, for plaintiff, Ana Voss, Ann Bildtsen, Assistant United States Attorneys, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 600, Minneapolis, MN 55415, for defendant.

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;



2. Andy LeRoy Elwood's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 13] is DENIED; and



3. The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 20] is GRANTED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: January 14, 2015

s/John R. Tunheim

JOHN R. TUNHEIM

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Elwood v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Jan 14, 2015
Civil No. 13-3645 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Elwood v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ANDY LEROY ELWOOD, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

Citations

Civil No. 13-3645 (JRT/HB) (D. Minn. Jan. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

Landreth v. Colvin

See Reichenbach v. Astrue, No. 4:11CV1551 TCM, 2012 WL 4049009, at *9 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 13, 2012). See also…

Howarth v. Berryhill

Therefore, courts following this rule have found the ALJ's obligations under SSR 96-6p to be satisfied where…