From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmore v. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 2002
299 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09595

Argued October 31, 2002.

November 25, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 and Education Law § 3020-a to review a determination of a Hearing Officer, dated April 9, 2001, which, after a hearing, found the petitioner, Edwin Elmore, guilty of misconduct and terminated his employment with the respondent Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jonas, J.), entered September 10, 2001, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Janet Axelrod, Albany, N.Y. (Paul D. Clayton of counsel), for appellant.

Guercio Guercio, Farmingdale, N.Y. (Barbara P. Aloe of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly confirmed the Hearing Officer's determination since the petitioner did not demonstrate any basis for vacating it under CPLR 7511 (see Education Law § 3020-a; Matter of Board of Educ. of Great Neck Union Free School Dist. v. Brandman, 286 A.D.2d 735; Matter of Roemer v. Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 268 A.D.2d 479). The Hearing Officer's determination had a rational basis and was supported by the record (see Matter of Fischer v. Smithtown Cent. School District, 262 A.D.2d 561).

The Supreme Court also properly determined that the petitioner was entitled to be paid only for the first 15 months of his suspension pending the completion of the disciplinary process pursuant to the terms of the applicable collective bargaining agreement (see Matter of Adlerstein v. Board of Educ., 64 N.Y.2d 90, 98; Matter of Board of Educ. of City of Rochester v. Nyquist, 48 N.Y.2d 97, 102). Under the circumstances of this case, the penalty of dismissal was justified (see Matter of Boyea v. Board of Educ., 209 A.D.2d 852).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, LUCIANO and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Elmore v. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 25, 2002
299 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Elmore v. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF EDWIN ELMORE, appellant, v. PLAINVIEW-OLD BETHPAGE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 25, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 545 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
750 N.Y.S.2d 514

Citing Cases

In re Halasy v. Dept. of Edu. of New York

The court finds that the petitioner has provided no basis to disturb the hearing officer's determination that…

In re Demarco v. N.Y. City Bd. Dept. of Educ.

Here, the petitioner did not demonstrate any basis for vacating the determination under CPLR 7511 ( see…