From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elmer v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 31, 1992

Appeal from the Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: In all respects but one, we agree with the Court of Claims' decision and order for reasons stated therein. We modify only with respect to claimant's disclosure requests numbers 15 and 16. Respondent must provide claimant with redacted transcripts of interviews of the 57 children and unredacted transcripts of interviews with the staff. Those interviews were conducted by the State of New York Commission on Quality Care for the Mentally Disabled in investigating incidents of child abuse and neglect allegedly occurring at the Western New York Children's Psychiatric Center. Those transcripts are not privileged pursuant to section 6527 (3) of the Education Law because they did not result from an internal medical or quality assurance review proceeding (see, Bush v. Dolan, 149 A.D.2d 799, 800-801; Byork v. Carmer, 109 A.D.2d 1087, 1088).


Summaries of

Elmer v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 31, 1992
179 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Elmer v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA ELMER, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of TRAVIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
579 N.Y.S.2d 271

Citing Cases

Strickland v. State

Education Law § 6527 (3) exempts three categories of documents from disclosure: records relating to medical…

Strickland v. State

Education Law § 6527 (3) exempts three categories of documents from disclosure: records relating to medical…