From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Elma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 9, 2005
895 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. 3D04-2597.

March 9, 2005.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Pedro P. Echarte, Jr., Judge.

Paul Emile Elma, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Michael E. Hantman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GREEN, RAMIREZ, and WELLS, JJ.


Paul Emile Elma appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Because the trial court did not attach documentation conclusively refuting the defendant's allegations, we remand this case to the trial court with directions to issue an amended order explaining why the original order was "without prejudice," attach documentation that refutes the defendant's claim, or provide the defendant with the twenty-four (24) additional days credit for time served in case no. 00-41144. See Davis v. State, 869 So.2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Wallen v. State, 860 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Bohler v. State, 747 So.2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).


Summaries of

Elma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 9, 2005
895 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Elma v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul Emile ELMA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 9, 2005

Citations

895 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Rosado v. State

We remand this case to the trial court with directions to attach documentation that refutes the Appellant's…